The coming collapse of America and the rise of Hyperinflation

      Home » World events & politics » The coming collapse of America and the rise of Hyperinflation

The coming collapse of America and the rise of Hyperinflation

Pretty sobering article, of course the collapse of America will also affect those countries with big investments in America such as the Arabs and the Chinese.

The coming financial collapse of the U.S. government: Fed papers reveal what's in store for Americans
by Mike Adams

The bankruptcy of the United States government has been talked about for years by independent observers. If you've read the book, "Empire of Debt," then you know where the U.S. is headed financially. But most people have no idea about the ultimate financial consequences of decades of borrowing and spending by Washington, and they remain irrationally convinced that the status quo will remain intact for eternity.

No one in any position of authority, you see, has yet admitted that the U.S. government is indeed going bankrupt.

Until now, that is.

In a remarkable paper posted by the Federal Reserve of St. Louis, and authored by a Boston University teacher named Prof Kotlikoff, it is revealed in blunt, powerful language that the era of borrowing and spending without consequence may soon come to a close.

The paper, entitled, Is the United States Bankrupt?

And what, exactly, does it say? For starters, Kotlikoff explains,
... Quote:
Unless the United States moves quickly to fundamentally change and restrain its fiscal behavior, its bankruptcy will become a foregone conclusion.

... the United States is going broke, [and] ...that radical reform of U.S. fiscal institutions is essential to secure the nation’s economic future.

Failure to engage in these massive reforms will inevitably result in the financial demise of the United States, Kotlikoff says:
... Quote:
[W]e have a country at the end of its resources. It’s exhausted, stripped bear, destitute, bereft, wanting in property, and wrecked (at least in terms of its consumption and borrowing capacity) in consequence of failure to pay its creditors.

In short, the country is bankrupt and is forced to reorganize its operations by paying its creditors (the oldsters) less than they were promised.

We might possibly be saved, he explains, if the nation engages in massive, radical reform in three areas:

1) Eliminating the current income tax system and moving to a national retail sales tax of 33 percent.

2) Privatizing social security so that workers own their savings accounts and the federal government can no longer swipe funds from Social Security.

3) Launching a national health insurance program that covers everyone and relies on a system of government-issued vouchers that citizens can spend with health insurance companies.

These radical reforms are necessary because the future gap between what the government owes and what it stands to receive in revenues is already monstrously large, and it's growing by the minute.

This gap, called the Gokhale and Smetters measure, currently stands at an astonishing $65.9 trillion. (Yes, with a "T".) As Kotlikoff explains,
... Quote:
This figure is more than five times U.S. GDP and almost twice the size of national wealth.

One way to wrap one’s head around $65.9 trillion is to ask what fiscal adjustments are needed to eliminate this red hole.

The answers are terrifying. One solution is an immediate and permanent doubling of personal and corporate income taxes.

Another is an immediate and permanent two-thirds cut in Social Security and Medicare benefits.

A third alternative, were it feasible, would be to immediately and permanently cut all federal discretionary spending by 143 percent.

If you read that last paragraph with any presence of mind, you now begin to understand the magnitude of the fiscal problem facing the United States. It could be solved, as explained above, by doubling all personal and corporate income taxes. But then what's the point in working? It could also be solved by slashing promised benefits in Social Security and Medicare. But what about the inevitable street riots?

None of these solutions are likely to occur. And that leaves the Ace up the sleeve. It's the Ace that all government eventually play on their way to bankruptcy and collapse, and it's the Ace that the United States will ultimately be forced to play, too: hyperinflation.

The U.S. will have to print more money to escape the financial consequences of its unbridled spending.

As Kotlikoff explains:
... Quote:
Given the reluctance of our politicians to raise taxes, cut benefits, or even limit the growth in benefits, the most likely scenario is that the government will start printing money to pay its bills.

This could arise in the context of the Federal Reserve “being forced” to buy Treasury bills and bonds to reduce interest rates. Specifically, once the financial markets begin to understand the depth and extent of the country’s financial insolvency, they will start worrying about inflation and about being paid back in watered-down dollars.

This concern will lead them to start dumping their holdings of U.S. Treasuries. In so doing, they’ll drive up interest rates, which will lead the Fed to print money to buy up those bonds.

The consequence will be more money creation—exactly what the bond traders will have come to fear. This could lead to spiraling expectations of higher inflation, with the process eventuating in hyperinflation.

It's not like it hasn't happened before. Hyperinflation is actually the norm, not the exception, and it's the escape route taken by virtually every country suffering under the burden of payment promises is cannot possibly keep.

Whether we're talking about Germany after World War I, or the United States over the next few years, hyperinflation is the only option remaining for politicians who refuse to practice fiscal sanity.

No politician ever got elected by promising voters their entitlements would be halted, did they? Political popularity is derived from promising voters precisely what the nation cannot afford: Endless entitlements and runaway spending without apparent consequence.

The China factor
The only thing keeping the U.S. afloat right now is the temporary willingness of Asian countries to keep buying U.S. debt, thereby pumping up the U.S. economy with dollars earned on the backs of Chinese laborers.

But even the Chinese -- known for their tolerance of hard times and manual labor -- may eventually tire of lending money to a posh, arrogant Western nation that has all but abandoned the concept of saving money. Says Kotlikoff,
... Quote:
China is saving so much that it’s running a current account surplus. Not only is China supplying capital to the rest of the world, it’s increasingly doing so via direct investment.

The question for the United States is whether China will tire of investing only indirectly in our country and begin to sell its dollar-denominated reserves. Doing so could have spectacularly bad implications for the value of the dollar and the level of U.S. interest rates.

By "spectacularly bad implications," Kotlikoff means the value of the U.S. dollar would plummet, the level of U.S. interest rates would skyrocket, and hyperinflation would be well underway. U.S. citizens would find not only their dollars to be near-worthless on the global market, but their savings to be all but wiped out as well. Sure, you'll still have the same number of dollars in your bank account, but they won't be worth anything.

This is what eventually happens, by the way, when a government eliminates the gold standard and separates its currency from precious metals. The U.S. dollar, a green piece of paper, technically stands for nothing other than the U.S. government's promise to pay. But when push comes to shove, the government will have no choice but to hyperinflate its way out of financial obligations, thereby rendering all currently-held U.S. dollars to be virtually worthless.

Those investors or citizens who hold savings in U.S. dollars will be wiped out by a government that will essentially steal their wealth without having to snatch a single physical dollar from their hands.

And yet, despite the seriousness of the U.S. fiscal situation, Americans and their elected representative live their merry lives oblivious to financial reality. National newspaper headlines even add to the denial, running headlines that claim the nation's economy is strong because the 2006 budget deficit will be "only" $296 billion.

That this is considered a success by the Bush Administration is testament to the psychotic fiscal self-deception that now serves as the norm in the United States. It's like a family that owes $1 million on a $200,000 home announcing "success" because it has just reduced its monthly credit card borrowing from $15,000 to $12,000. And that's if you actually believe the numbers, because if there's one area where Washington has proven its skill, it's the expert deployment of smoke and mirrors on all things involving numbers.

Cutting the annual budget deficit won't save us anyway. It only means that we're barreling head-first into a brick wall at a slightly slower pace than before. The entitlements will still come due:

... Quote:
There are 77 million baby boomers now ranging from age 41 to age 59. All are hoping to collect tens of thousands of dollars in pension and healthcare benefits from the next generation.

These claimants aren’t going away. In three years, the oldest boomers will be eligible for early Social Security benefits. In six years, the boomer vanguard will start collecting Medicare. Our nation has done nothing to prepare for this onslaught of obligation. Instead, it has continued to focus on a completely meaningless fiscal metric—“the” federal deficit—censored and studiously ignored long-term fiscal analyses that are scientifically coherent, and dramatically expanded the benefit levels being explicitly or implicitly promised to the baby boomers.

The result of this is not in question: The United States government is already running on fumes, and in a few more years, it will suffer financial collapse.

"Countries can and do go bankrupt," says Kotlikoff, and the U.S. is no exception to the laws of economic reality.

The American people, as usual, remain oblivious to the financial future that awaits them. Even as the housing bubble is now beginning to burst in the nation's most overpriced real estate markets, most people don't have a clue what "hard times" really means. To today's debt-ridden yuppie spenders, "hard times" means shuffling six different credit card accounts to cover the payments on an overpriced house, two new SUVs in the driveway and a vacation to Paris, none of which the yuppie couple can afford.

The idea of ever having to pay back their debt and live within their means is as foreign to most Americans as it is their own government. Financial consequences have been put off so habitually, for so long, that people forget they even exist. And thus the reality awakening becomes ever more rude when it finally appears.

To say that most Americans will be in a state of shock when their life savings are suddenly wiped out is an understatement: These people will have never even imagined such an event is possible, much less contemplated how it might affect them.


The whole document
 http://research.stlouisfed....


This article from
 http://www.newstarget.com/z...
By netchicken: posted on 20-1-2008

The author is really into raising taxes. He speaks of that as if it is some sort of cure. It is not. What that will do is damage the economy, drive even more businesses overseas and make us even more hollow than what we are now.
Reagan proved that was a stupid thing to do when he did the opposite and brought more moeny into the hands of the politicians. What they need to do is slash taxes, slach unconstitutional spending, go to the Fair Tax plan and try and forget about "printing more money" as that will kill us.
By Thomas_Crowne: posted on 20-1-2008

From my rereading of the article the writer says a time will come when the $65.9 trillion will have to be paid back.

But is this the case?

Surely the first step would be just to stop the decrease and then to slowly start to reduce the debt.

... Quote:
These radical reforms are necessary because the future gap between what the government owes and what it stands to receive in revenues is already monstrously large, and it's growing by the minute.


If this gap is the total amount the country owes minus the amount it gets each year as revenue, then it doesn't have to be paid back at once.

Country debt is not like individual debt. Country debt can go on for generations.

Some really good ideas here
 http://www.digg.com/busines...
By netchicken: posted on 21-1-2008

Ok I think I have got it...

The time is arriving when
the amount of money you need to earn (Y)
to pay off the current obligations for the debt (X)
is LESS THAN the amount the government actually gets (Z)

So this is similar to a person with a mortgage being unable to pay of the interest on the mortgage, not to mention being able to pay off the loan itself.

Thats pretty bad.

From a Digg poster...
... Quote:
The paper is actually about as sane as you can while still predicting that the U.S. is going to go bankrupt.

It basically works like this:
The U.S. government is currently obligated to pay a certain amount in the future: $X
The U.S. citizens will produce a certain amount in the future: $Y
The U.S. government will take a percentage of $Y (or create more money) to pay for $X: $Z

He argues we are nearing a point where:
Y*Z < X

In fact, we are already there and borrowing to make up the difference.

We can't borrow forever and not pay people back, so unless we make some big fundamental changes or there is a huge productivity leap, we are screwed. The government is going to pay somehow or go bankrupt (not pay back it's obligations).

The only way to pay is to significantly raise taxes, significantly cut spending, or create a bunch of money. Which of those three choices do you think the government will pick? Creating a bunch of money causes hyperinflation. Hyperinflation is bad.


Some really good ideas here
 http://www.digg.com/busines...
By netchicken: posted on 21-1-2008

The thing about assertions like the ones the author is making is that they do not take into account for any changes in policies and the effects of the policy changes.
As I said, cutting taxes and not raising them, while simultaneously slashing government spending, will quickly alter our government's fiscal course. It would help, anyway. There's still another problem we face, and this problem might be enough to sink us regardless of tyhe otehr stated corrections.

Those in charge have unilaterally opened our country to what they call "free trade", which in essence means we do not protect our economy as others do, we allow our corporations to go overseas for cheap labor and then send the goods and products back in country for sell at substantially higher profits while at the same time kicking the American worker to the curb. Well over half of the American consumers are carrying debt they can't pay off at the end of the month, just like the government. This all is contributing to the perfect economic storm.

Free trade results in giving our money, our manufactures, and our markets to other nations. William McKinley, 1892
By Thomas_Crowne: posted on 21-1-2008








The coming collapse of America and the rise of Hyperinflation | [Login ]
Powered by XMB
Privacy Policy